tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-40699093946164684922024-03-05T06:36:11.734-08:00Defending St. LouisCriminal Defense Lawyer Meets Soap Box.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06121623853840426212noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4069909394616468492.post-26841343242088061402017-05-04T12:23:00.000-07:002017-05-04T12:24:28.015-07:00How Sentencing Enhancement for Persistent Drug Offenders Functions Unfairly<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=4069909394616468492" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"></a>Missouri's statutory sentencing enhancements for prior and persistent drug offenders do not appropriately punish the different types of drug dealers. You may think, "Who cares? All drug dealers belong in prison for as long as we can keep them there". If that is your position, the 8th Amendment would like to have a word with you. Also, go read <strong><a data-mce-href="http://www.riverfronttimes.com/stlouis/despite-recent-reforms-missouris-prior-and-persistent-drug-offenders-are-still-stuck-without-a-chance-of-parole/Content?oid=3061952" href="http://www.riverfronttimes.com/stlouis/despite-recent-reforms-missouris-prior-and-persistent-drug-offenders-are-still-stuck-without-a-chance-of-parole/Content?oid=3061952" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">this Riverfront Times article</a></strong> posted last week about this very topic and then come back. It is a "must read" if you are interested in how these statutes affect real people in the real world.<br />
<br /></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">
For the rest of you, here is the crux. The Missouri statutes that enhance sentences for prior and persistent drug offenders establish a one-size-fits-all punishment scheme that has the tendency to treat small time drug users selling to support their own habit like big time drug traffickers moving product around the state. To be clear, no one is saying dealing or manufacturing drugs is okay. But, not all drug dealers are equally culpable and should not therefore be punished as if they are.</div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">
So how does all this work?<br />
<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a></div>
<h4 style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">
First, you must understand just exactly who is considered a prior and/or persistent drug offender?</h4>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">
Under <strong><a data-mce-href="http://www.moga.mo.gov/mostatutes/stathtml/19500002751.html" href="http://www.moga.mo.gov/mostatutes/stathtml/19500002751.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">RSMo. 195.275</a></strong>, <strong>you are a prior drug offender if you have previously pleaded guilty to or have been found guilty of any felony offense relating to controlled substances</strong> in any basically any state, federal or territorial jurisdiction within the United States. You are a persistent drug offender if this has happened more than once. The State would be required to prove your status as a prior and/or persistent offender in any future prosecutions, but this is usually easily done by submitting a certified copy of the court record from your previous case.</div>
<h4 style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">
Once a "persistent drug offender", how does that affect someone's new drug distribution charge?</h4>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">
Once classified as a persistent offender under RSMo. 195.275, you will now face an enhanced punishment under <strong><a data-mce-href="http://www.moga.mo.gov/mostatutes/stathtml/19500002912.html" href="http://www.moga.mo.gov/mostatutes/stathtml/19500002912.html">RSMo. 195.291</a></strong>.<br />
<br /></div>
<div class="mceTemp" style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">
<dl class="wp-caption aligncenter" data-mce-style="width: 599px;" id="attachment_185" style="-webkit-user-drag: none; margin: 0px auto; max-width: 100%; width: 599px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt" style="-webkit-user-drag: none;"><a class="http://www.moga.mo.gov/mostatutes/stathtml/19500002912.html" data-mce-href="http://www.moga.mo.gov/mostatutes/stathtml/19500002912.html" href="http://www.moga.mo.gov/mostatutes/stathtml/19500002912.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="-webkit-user-drag: none;" target="_blank"><img alt="RSMo. 195.291" class="wp-image-185" data-mce-src="http://glaesmanlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/PO-Drug-Offender-Distribution-1024x385.jpg" height="221" src="https://glaesmanlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/PO-Drug-Offender-Distribution-1024x385.jpg" style="-webkit-user-drag: none; display: block; height: auto; max-width: 100%;" width="589" /></a></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd" style="-webkit-user-drag: none; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0.5em;">RSMo. 195.291</dd></dl>
</div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">
<strong><br /></strong>
<strong>The portion of this statute really at issue here and in the RFT article above, is the portion that reads "without probation or parole" or WOPP</strong>. If you have two or more prior drug convictions or findings of guilt, not only will you be sentenced as a Class A Felon on your new case - carrying a minimum sentence of 10 years and a maximum of life - but you will serve every day of that sentence.</div>
<h4 style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">
Why does the WOPP provision matter so much?</h4>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">
Before you can understand the significance of the WOPP portion of RSMo. 195.291, you must understand how the Department of Corrections (DOC) calculates parole eligibility. <strong>The date on which you are eligible for parole depends many of factors.</strong> Two major factors, however are 1.) the type of crime for which you were sentenced and 2.) how many times you have been committed to prison (often referred to as your "commitment count").<br />
<br /></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">
Typically, the percentage of a your sentence you will be required to serve before being eligible for parole on a drug charge is very, very low. Additionally, the DOC does not factor in commitment counts in determining parole eligibility for drug offenders. However, once you are sentenced under the WOPP provision of 195.291, you will serve every day of your sentence.</div>
<h4 style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">
For Example:</h4>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">
The following is a very simplified example of how the WOPP portion of this statute has the tendency to function unfairly against small time users:</div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=4069909394616468492" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"></a>Joe was convicted of two counts of <a data-mce-href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/practice-areas/" href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/practice-areas/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">possession of a controlled substance</a> in 2008. He had one xanax and and three oxycodone pills without a prescription. In 2013, he had a prescription for vicodin but was busted selling some of his left over pills to an undercover cop. Joe is a "persistent offender" and under RSMo. 195.291 now technically faces 10 to 30 years, or life in prison without the possibility of parole.<br />
<br /></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">
Bill was convicted of selling a substantial amount methamphetamine in 2010. In 2014, he was busted again for manufacturing meth with the intent to sell it. He also faces 10 to 30 years, or life in prison, but as a "prior offender", he has the possibility of parole.</div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">
<strong>Even if Joe is sentenced to 10 years, and Bill is sentenced to 20 years, Joe will serve more actual time in prison because he is not eligible for parole.</strong> It's not even close. Bill could be out in three maybe four years while Joe serves the whole 10.</div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px;">
While the example above is very simplistic, it underscores the importance of <strong>judging the culpability of a drug dealer by more than just the number of prior drug offenses they have</strong>. The WOPP provision of RSMo. 195.291 too easily functions in a way that incarcerates small time drug users selling to support their addiction even longer than state-wide drug magnates.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<span style="color: black; font-family: Times; font-size: small; text-align: center;">The </span><a href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/" style="font-family: Times; font-size: small; text-align: center;" target="_blank"><b>Glaesman Law Firm, LLC</b></a><span style="color: black; font-family: Times; font-size: x-small; text-align: center;"> is a full service criminal defense law firm located at </span><a href="https://www.google.com/maps/place/Glaesman+Law+Firm,+LLC/@38.7751673,-90.4842224,15z/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x0:0xd2780ca8e60b562e?sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwioiZ6I2-LPAhUF94MKHeJmC-YQ_BIIajAL" style="font-family: Times; font-size: small; text-align: center;" target="_blank"><b>820 S. Main St. Suite 208, St. Charles, Missouri 63301</b></a><span style="color: black; font-family: Times; font-size: x-small; text-align: center;">. If you or a loved one has been charged with a crime or is facing a probation violation hearing, </span><b style="color: black; font-family: Times; font-size: small; text-align: center;"><a href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/contact/" target="_blank">call them right away</a></b><span style="color: black; font-family: Times; font-size: x-small; text-align: center;"> to discuss your options.</span></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06121623853840426212noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4069909394616468492.post-30382053105074509322017-04-10T09:35:00.001-07:002017-04-10T09:35:58.963-07:00On Gorsuch..<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.denverpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/neil-gorsuch-supreme-court-nominee-013.jpg?w=620" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="http://www.denverpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/neil-gorsuch-supreme-court-nominee-013.jpg?w=620" height="400" width="266" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Not an Actual Robot. </td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Today, President Trump swore Judge Gorsuch into the highest court in the land. The moment was lauded by the right, criticized by the left. I don't care much for the politics of it all. What I do care about is the impact this new judge will have on the application of criminal laws, decisions and procedure going forward.<br />
<br />
Part of the job of a <a href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/contact/" target="_blank">criminal defense attorney</a> is to provide the client with a feasible strategy aimed at an acquittal. The viewpoints and tendencies of the particular judge sitting on the case absolutely informs and shapes that strategy. A winner argument with one judge, may be a loser argument with another. Judge Gorsuch, now firmly implanted on the highest court for life, will be weighing arguments from attorneys and deciding winners and losers. The difference is, of course, that his winners and losers will trickle down into all the state, federal and municipal courts across the country. As such, like any good criminal attorney must do on every case, it is important to assess his viewpoints and tendencies all the same.<br />
<br />
<h4>
What is legal isn't always right, what is right isn't always legal.</h4>
<br />
Any judge, but especially one on the SCOTUS has to address this paradigm in their own way. Do I apply the law exactly as the legislature has written it? Or do I apply notions of fundamental fairness, constitutional protections, and maybe a little bit of my own original thought to the discussion? I mean, its called a judicial "opinion" for a reason right? Again, I'm not interested in the politics of either judicial philosophy so much as how Judge Gorsuch's views on it will affect people in this country.<br />
<br />
One of the more publicized opinions given by Judge Gorsuch is that of <a href="https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/15/15-9504.pdf" target="_blank">the frozen truck driver</a>. In short, a truck driver, stranded on the side of an Illinois road in freezing weather with frozen trailer brakes and a low fuel tank began to experience what he believed to be hypothermia. His company told him to stay put, or drag the trailer somewhere with frozen breaks. Three hours later, the driver unhooked the trailer and drove off in search of gas. His trucking company later fired him for not following orders.<br />
<br />
The 10th Circuit Court found in favor of the truck driver 2-1, however Judge Gorsuch was the lone dissenter. According to Judge Gorsuch, the company had not acted illegally since, even though there is federal law protecting drivers from being fired for refusing to operate their vehicle in a manner they deem unsafe, that law does not apply to this case. In short, he wrote:<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-size: 16px;"><span style="font-family: "times" , "times new roman" , serif;">"The trucker was fired only after he declined the statutorily protected option (refuse to operate) and chose instead to operate his vehicle in a manner he thought wise but his employer did not."</span></span></blockquote>
While this case was civil, not criminal, it serves and an instance where Judge Gorsuch has applied a strict reading of the federal law. There is no human element applied to the plight of this trucker. The law says X, your particular situation is basically X but not quite, so you're out of luck.<br />
<br />
By eschewing the human element of the statute, Judge Gorsuch failed to do precisely the the thing congress intended to achieve by writing it: Protect truck drivers from being forced into deciding between being put in danger of death or being fired. If the court had followed Judge Gorsuch's strict interpretation of that statute, truck drivers would be less safe and employers would have more power over their employees.<br />
<br />
In the criminal law context, Judge Gorsuch has sided with the police on many occasions. He sided with a cop who put a 9 year old in a headlock over a stolen iPad. He also declined to provide relief to a guy who, after a trial, got life in prison even though his lawyer told him he had to go to trial, or the he, the lawyer, would quit his case.<br />
<br />
<h4>
So...We're Screwed?</h4>
<br />
Actually, no. Not really. On the other side of the coin, Judge Gorsuch is on record disagreeing with colleagues who have held that a cop could arrest a school kid for burping in class and that a guy could be held responsible for a breaking an obscure law he didn't even know existed or applied to him. Judge Gorsuch has also indicated that he has a healthy skepticism of a world where the prosecutorial discretion is unquestioned allowing them to use criminal law to pick and choose their targets as they see fit. Add to all this a strong belief in the Fourth Amendment, Judge Gorsuch at least appears to have an open mind to the plight and circumstances faced by those charged with crimes in this country.<br />
<br />
We'll see what happens once he actually, you know, rules on a case and writes an opinion. Until then, I will reserve judgment (See what I did there?) as to whether Judge Gorsuch will be good, or bad, for the criminal justice system.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<span style="text-align: center;">The </span><a href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/" style="font-size: small; text-align: center;" target="_blank"><b>Glaesman Law Firm, LLC</b></a><span style="font-size: x-small; text-align: center;"> is a full service criminal defense law firm located at </span><a href="https://www.google.com/maps/place/Glaesman+Law+Firm,+LLC/@38.7751673,-90.4842224,15z/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x0:0xd2780ca8e60b562e?sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwioiZ6I2-LPAhUF94MKHeJmC-YQ_BIIajAL" style="font-size: small; text-align: center;" target="_blank"><b>820 S. Main St. Suite 208, St. Charles, Missouri 63301</b></a><span style="font-size: x-small; text-align: center;">. If you or a loved one has been charged with a crime or is facing a probation violation hearing, </span><b style="font-size: small; text-align: center;"><a href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/contact/" target="_blank">call them right away</a></b><span style="font-size: x-small; text-align: center;"> to discuss your options.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06121623853840426212noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4069909394616468492.post-55437797939285422512017-01-06T12:39:00.001-08:002017-01-06T12:39:13.962-08:00The Missouri Criminal Code has been rewritten. Why?In the state of Missouri, the "criminal code" is the series of laws that make certain kinds of conduct crimes and proscribes punishments for those crimes. Originally, about 4 decades ago the criminal code was written "to organize Missouri's criminal laws into a coherent body of statutes, eliminate archaic language, provide consistent and complete provisions regarding sentencing and provide clear statements not only of the elements of the particular crime, but also of the general principles and defenses which affect criminal liability". <i>Univ. of Mo-Columbia Sch. of Law, The New Missouri Criminal Code: Manual for Court Related Personnel Section 1.1 (1978).</i><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<i><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHu__P74mWZbWqYlMCoGH3QQJ298nW4b6Odl_zKmdyd4DxoGTOobLNnOuIp80jsAksN7mWz5bgi5Ee-mS-aBI5WLu7KVzntcST1ujIdffDooMMSXCPjEAe1YJae06k8ZYQrhMOguf6zeO9/s1600/binary-code-9004-2560x1600.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHu__P74mWZbWqYlMCoGH3QQJ298nW4b6Odl_zKmdyd4DxoGTOobLNnOuIp80jsAksN7mWz5bgi5Ee-mS-aBI5WLu7KVzntcST1ujIdffDooMMSXCPjEAe1YJae06k8ZYQrhMOguf6zeO9/s320/binary-code-9004-2560x1600.jpg" width="320" /></a></i></div>
<br />
<i><br /></i>
Apparently, over the past 40 years since this original code was written, the legislature believed it to have been degraded through the enactment of amendments trying to address the crime of the day. The Revised code that went into effect in 2017 seeks to fix all that by making the code easier to read and understand, eliminating outdated/obsolete crimes, classifying offenses differently for a more nuanced, fair approach to sentencing and putting as many criminal statutes in one place as possible.<br />
<br />
So how does this affect you?<br />
<br />
Simple. Some things that used to be crimes no longer are. Some things that weren't crimes last week, are crimes now. Some crimes are still crimes, but the punishments are different. The rest is legal mumbo jumbo making with the intention of making it easier to figure out what the hell the law even is.<br />
<br />
Its too early to tell whether or not the revisions were a good idea. While I have spend some time reading it, it is impossible to tell how the revised code will work in the real world until I've worked with it, you know, in the real world. So, stand by. I'll try to write a little more about the specific changes and how the new, revised code will actually affect the lives of Missourians in this space as I experience it.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
The <a href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/" style="font-size: small;" target="_blank"><b>Glaesman Law Firm, LLC</b></a><span style="font-size: x-small; text-align: center;"> is a full service criminal defense law firm located at </span><a href="https://www.google.com/maps/place/Glaesman+Law+Firm,+LLC/@38.7751673,-90.4842224,15z/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x0:0xd2780ca8e60b562e?sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwioiZ6I2-LPAhUF94MKHeJmC-YQ_BIIajAL" style="font-size: small;" target="_blank"><b>820 S. Main St. Suite 208, St. Charles, Missouri 63301</b></a><span style="font-size: x-small; text-align: center;">. If you or a loved one has been charged with a crime or is facing a probation violation hearing, </span><b style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/contact/" target="_blank">call them right away</a></b><span style="font-size: x-small; text-align: center;"> to discuss your options.</span></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06121623853840426212noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4069909394616468492.post-2882668918989885382016-12-07T12:19:00.003-08:002016-12-07T12:19:42.668-08:00Part 3: Your Reasons for Talking to Police are Dumb.In the first two parts of this series, we've established that <a href="http://stlcriminaldefense.blogspot.com/2016/11/part-1-talking-to-police-suckers-bet.html" target="_blank">i<b>t is unwise to make a statement to police who suspect you of a crime</b></a>. We've also covered why, despite knowing this to be true, <a href="http://stlcriminaldefense.blogspot.com/2016/11/part-2-why-do-you-talk-to-cops-who.html" target="_blank"><b>people make those statements anyway</b></a>. You may want to go back and read those articles before continuing on with this one.<br />
<br />
<span style="color: blue; font-size: large;">1. They already think you're guilty.</span><br />
<br />
<div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj55ZyxLPTVEjtO0o0jBRf4tpVpSKypjQn68BiqEMbupmvzr4PQH4j8HRus7CFJD9882uGhIqSr05uzYLtcDZnshOSIKuagkY2kXLXBOWBHpyHaz2Hu3qoWA-YBNa26XsqkVwdmlYliR7ux/s1600/taped-shut-emoticon.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj55ZyxLPTVEjtO0o0jBRf4tpVpSKypjQn68BiqEMbupmvzr4PQH4j8HRus7CFJD9882uGhIqSr05uzYLtcDZnshOSIKuagkY2kXLXBOWBHpyHaz2Hu3qoWA-YBNa26XsqkVwdmlYliR7ux/s200/taped-shut-emoticon.png" width="165" /></a>If you are being interrogated by police officers who suspect you committed the particular crime they are investigating, you likely already appear guilty to them. Otherwise, why are you there? But, whether you appear guilty or innocent to the investigating officers isn't really the most important factor to consider. The police do not charge you with a crime, prosecutors do. So, in the long run it doesn't matter how you appear to the officer.<br />
<br />
Its true. The only thing that matters is what the prosecutor can prove. If he or she can prove that you more likely than not committed the crime for which you are being interrogated, you will be charged. <span style="color: #b45f06;"><b>Thus, the police interrogation has one purpose and one purpose only: To get you to provide evidence that the prosecutor can use to later charge, and convict you of the crime.</b></span> When you voluntarily make a statement or allow yourself to be interviewed, you are helping the prosecutor do just that.</div>
<div>
<span style="color: blue; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="color: blue; font-size: large;">2. You're not smarter than the cops.</span><br />
<br />
When you're being interrogated by the police, whether you come out of that room in an orange jumper or your street clothes has as to do with much more than your intelligence. You will be in a room for hours and hours with many different officers all highly trained to do one thing: Get you to talk. <span style="color: #b45f06;"><b>They have taken classes and seminars and put in hours and hours of work in the field to be good at this one thing. But, sure, you passed your drivers exam on the first try so I'm sure you'll be good. </b></span>See you in 10 to 20 years, brother. It's this mindset that causes innocent people to confess to crimes they did not commit every day.<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span><span style="color: blue; font-size: large;">3. You will not get out of jail sooner, and you might be staying long term.</span><br />
<br />
By making a statement, you are not increasing your odds of being home for dinner. All you are doing is increasing your odds of being convicted and staying in jail long-term. A very long, long term. You are sacrificing your end-game odds of avoiding prison in the long-term by taking a very poor bet that you'll be out sooner in the short-term.<br />
<br />
Remember, prison is a long-term proposition. <span style="color: #b45f06;"><b>When you are suspected by police of a crime, everything you should do from that point forward must be done for the purposes putting you in the best possible position to win your case and avoiding jail altogether. </b></span>This means you might spend an uncomfortable 24 hours in jail without making a statement. Or it might mean that you are charged with the crime anyway and expected to make bail in a couple weeks. Remember, it's better to not make a statement and suffer for a very short period of time on the front end of all of this rather than make a statement causing your conviction on the back end.<br />
<br />
<span style="color: blue;"><b><br /></b></span><span style="color: blue; font-size: large;">4. That Cop is not going to talk to the judge on your behalf. </span><br />
<br />
The easiest way for the prosecutor to make her case against you is for you to confess. While innocent people confess every day, the simple fact is that you will have an uphill battle trying to convince your jury that you are one of those people. Officers know it. Prosecutors know it. That is why they will try for hours and hours to get your statement. A confession on the front end of an investigation makes their lives easier and your conviction more probable on the back end.<br />
<br />
So, no. This officer is not going to put in a good word for you with the judge because you talked. And no, this officer is not going to ask the prosecutor to go easy on you because you took responsibility.<br />
<br />
And if you're worried about people "thinking you're a monster", worry not. That officer already thinks you're a monster because, in his mind, you are guilty. Its not as though he's going to go on his next donut break and think, "You know..that guy murdered someone. But at least he waived his right to remain silent and confessed to it. He's not a monster after all."<br />
<br />
And again, it does not matter what that officer thinks of you. (See #1). Hell, nothing anyone thinks of you for remaining silent is worth convicting yourself by talking to police interrogators.<br />
<br />
<span style="color: blue; font-size: large;">5. Do not talk just because you do not know how to invoke your rights.</span><br />
<br />
<div>
When people actually do invoke their rights to remain silent or to have an attorney, they aren't sure what it means. <span style="color: #b45f06;"><b>This is no accident as courts have been trying since the Miranda decision to clearly adjudicate just what it means for someone to invoke their rights.</b> </span> You know that you HAVE the right to remain silent, but how do you invoke that right? You know you HAVE the right to an attorney, but how do you get one?<br />
<br />
I've you've stopped reading because you think the simple answer is that you remain silent by REMAINING SILENT and you get an attorney simply by ASKING FOR AN ATTORNEY, you'd be right. However, it's not that simple.<br />
<br />
When you say you'd like to remain silent, the officer will ask, "Are you sure? Cause I can't help you if you wont talk to me." And then you'll think, well, I'd like some help. And you ask him a question. And another question. And next thing you know you're talking to him. And next thing you know after that is that you've now waived the right to remain silent that you initially, smartly, invoked at the beginning without even knowing you did it.</div>
<div>
<div style="text-align: right;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
The <a href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/" style="font-size: small;" target="_blank"><b>Glaesman Law Firm, LLC</b></a><span style="font-size: x-small; text-align: center;"> is a full service criminal defense law firm located at </span><a href="https://www.google.com/maps/place/Glaesman+Law+Firm,+LLC/@38.7751673,-90.4842224,15z/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x0:0xd2780ca8e60b562e?sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwioiZ6I2-LPAhUF94MKHeJmC-YQ_BIIajAL" style="font-size: small;" target="_blank"><b>820 S. Main St. Suite 208, St. Charles, Missouri 63301</b></a><span style="font-size: x-small; text-align: center;">. If you or a loved one has been charged with a crime or is facing a probation violation hearing, </span><b style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/contact/" target="_blank">call them right away</a></b><span style="font-size: x-small; text-align: center;"> to discuss your options.</span></div>
</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06121623853840426212noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4069909394616468492.post-22235558164761205032016-11-30T13:44:00.002-08:002016-11-30T13:47:37.862-08:00Part 2: Why Do You Talk to Cops Who Suspect You of a Crime?Previously: <a href="http://stlcriminaldefense.blogspot.com/2016/11/part-1-talking-to-police-suckers-bet.html" target="_blank">Part 1: Talking to Police. A Sucker's Bet.</a><br />
<br />
As noted in the introductory post to this series, it is widely known that talking to the cops is a bad idea when you are the suspect of an alleged crime. Yet, day after day people march themselves to their neighborhood precinct at the behest of their local constabulary to spill their guts.<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj7zmJVeMOXyX-UpLPkmkgjJMZYWgLc7O-c1fas1MFx-TQ8cJ53rmigLAJg9u5sqKBllZM5WmzhkgAGbChDqIbLe-_mUFlx19cmSPTnI8qxtZ4b8oBX2UvjWS53IuViNcQQQ3jZfIjgO24x/s1600/keyser-sze-05.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="243" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj7zmJVeMOXyX-UpLPkmkgjJMZYWgLc7O-c1fas1MFx-TQ8cJ53rmigLAJg9u5sqKBllZM5WmzhkgAGbChDqIbLe-_mUFlx19cmSPTnI8qxtZ4b8oBX2UvjWS53IuViNcQQQ3jZfIjgO24x/s320/keyser-sze-05.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Is this you? If not, then shut your trap.</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
If you <span style="font-family: inherit;">are planning to do th</span>e same, ask yourself, <span style="color: blue;">"</span><span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="color: blue;"><b><a href="https://youtu.be/XYXXhn9fMYs?t=1m47s" target="_blank">Am I Keyser Söze?</a>" </b></span>I</span>f the answer is "no", then you should probably reconsider your plan.*<br />
<br />
Which begs the question, <b>if it's so obvious that you shouldn't talk to the cops when they suspect you of a crime, <span style="color: orange;">why are so many people not named <span style="font-family: inherit;">Keyser S</span></span></b><span style="color: orange;"><b style="background-color: white; font-size: 14px;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">ö</span></b><b><span style="font-family: inherit;">ze </span>constantly spilling their guts to the police?</b></span><br />
<br />
<b style="font-size: x-large;">5 Reasons You Voluntarily Talk to Cops who Suspect you of a Crime</b><br />
<span style="font-size: medium;"><b> </b></span><br />
<span style="color: blue; font-size: large;">1. You do not want to <u>appear</u> guilty.</span><br />
<br />
<div>
Whether you did it or didn't do it, at the very beginning you understandably do not want to do anything to APPEAR guilty. <span style="color: orange;">You worry that, if you refuse to talk to the police officer wanting to interrogate you, that officer will assume that you are guilty. </span>Otherwise, why wouldn't you talk? What do you have to hide? And if you weren't already sure whether that officer feels that way, they will surely leave no doubt by asking you those very same questions when you politely decline to comment.</div>
<div>
<span style="color: blue; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="color: blue; font-size: large;">2. You think you are smarter than the cops.</span><br />
<br />
You've got your story straight, right? You rehearsed it the whole way down to the police station. It's easy: W, then X, then Y, then Z. All you have to do now is spit it out just like you rehearsed and you'll be home before dinner....right? Wrong. <span style="color: orange;">What happens when the officer asks you about shark?</span> Wait, what? Shark? Uh oh...<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: blue; font-size: large;">3. You want to get out of jail sooner rather than later.</span><br />
<br />
Many times when you are being questioned by authorities who accuse you of a crime, you are on what is called a "24 hour hold". A 24 hour hold is exactly what it sounds like - the police can hold you for up to 24 hours while they investigate the crime. In short, get comfortable.<br />
<br />
But who has 24 hours to just hang out at the station? There are jobs to work, kids to rear, and Netflix originals to binge. And if you don't talk, they might just file the case with what they have and hold you for days/weeks/months. <span style="color: orange;">So, you think if you just talk to the police and give them your side of the story, they'll certainly believe in your innocence and you'll be home by dinner.</span> Get that pesky felony thingy allllll cleared up,<br />
<span style="color: blue;"><b><br /></b></span>
<span style="color: blue; font-size: large;">4. You believe the false promises made to you by the police interrogator.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: orange;">Officer's want you to talk. Many times they NEED you to talk.</span> Your confession could be the difference between an unsolved case and a guilty verdict, or a hard fought acquittal at trial and guilty plea down the road. <span style="color: orange;">This desire to get a confession leads to empty promises.</span> They sound like this, "I can help you with the prosecutor if you're just honest with me". "It'll look much better for you later in court if you admit you're guilty to me right now". "Your family, friends and community will think you're a monster if you don't take responsibility - I can help you prevent that". Suddenly, you exist in a world where you believe the future of your reality is a binary choice between being a monster or non-monster. It is easy to start talking to prevent monster-hood.<br />
<span style="color: blue; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: blue; font-size: large;">5. You misunderstand your rights under the law.</span><br />
<br />
<div>
Before any interrogation, you will likely sign a "Waiver of Rights" form that will be read to you by the police. Despite signing the form, people misunderstand these rights. They know they have a right to remain silent and a right to have an attorney present, they just don't understand that invoking those rights is not an admission of guilt in and of itself. They think guilt will be inferred by the courts when they ask for an attorney or decide to remain silent or that doing so loses them the presumption of innocence.<br />
<br />
*If you don't know who <b>Keyser S</b><b style="background-color: white; font-size: 14px;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">ö</span></b><b>ze</b> is, just get off my blog right now, you animal. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="color: blue; font-size: large;">Coming Up:</span></div>
<div>
Next week I will write about how all of these reasons for talking are dumb in Part 3: Your Reasons for Talking are Dumb.<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
The <a href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/" style="font-size: small; text-align: center;" target="_blank"><b>Glaesman Law Firm, LLC</b></a><span style="font-size: x-small; text-align: center;"> is a full service criminal defense law firm located at </span><a href="https://www.google.com/maps/place/Glaesman+Law+Firm,+LLC/@38.7751673,-90.4842224,15z/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x0:0xd2780ca8e60b562e?sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwioiZ6I2-LPAhUF94MKHeJmC-YQ_BIIajAL" style="font-size: small; text-align: center;" target="_blank"><b>820 S. Main St. Suite 208, St. Charles, Missouri 63301</b></a><span style="font-size: x-small; text-align: center;">. If you or a loved one has been charged with a crime or is facing a probation violation hearing, </span><b style="font-size: small; text-align: center;"><a href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/contact/" target="_blank">call them right away</a></b><span style="font-size: x-small; text-align: center;"> to discuss your options.</span></div>
</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06121623853840426212noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4069909394616468492.post-55015029792905769692016-11-15T12:50:00.006-08:002016-11-15T13:02:06.571-08:00Part 1: Talking to Police - A Sucker's Bet.When you are accused of a crime, or the police suspect you of a crime, one of the first things they will do is "just try to get you to answer a few questions". Sounds simple enough, but your answers to those few questions are likely going to land you in a legal mess. And by "legal mess", I mean sharing a 6x8 cell with some dude named Clarence for the foreseeable future. That is why any criminal defense attorney worth his weight in mahogany will tell you to keep your mouth shut!<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgqHA__opajEqiaZQXQIddIAU6yzTYRIv9IKj3ErHi0hRJ9Vnegiu2dnHmMqW5EpH5iRMU-Fg_0KrUNBHxVYZK6z6oJpT8VufllqfPbHI3gWOoAouOc7knnpQugiDfel1kD4UxBjRERr8OQ/s1600/interrogation-chair.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgqHA__opajEqiaZQXQIddIAU6yzTYRIv9IKj3ErHi0hRJ9Vnegiu2dnHmMqW5EpH5iRMU-Fg_0KrUNBHxVYZK6z6oJpT8VufllqfPbHI3gWOoAouOc7knnpQugiDfel1kD4UxBjRERr8OQ/s320/interrogation-chair.jpg" width="240" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Lamp probably not from Pottery Barn.</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
But here's the thing - if the answer is so clearly to just shut your trap, why do so many people willingly subject themselves to police interrogations? I mean, luckily for the people who manufacture those weirdly hot, hangy-down overhead lights found only in interrogation rooms they do. But unluckily for the next innocent person who walks into the station to falsely confess to a crime they did not commit, there is still so much confusion on this issue.<br />
<br />
No joke - as a criminal defense lawyer, the question I get asked the most other than "how do you defend THOSE people" is "Should I cooperate with police?" After all, they are the police. Right? Sworn to protect and serve.<br />
<br />
Cooperate? Yes. Always obey commands and follow orders. <span style="color: orange;">But give a statement after being held for 12 hours without sleep, food, air conditioning (or heat) or a lawyer? Absolutely not. </span>Knowing your rights when subjected to a custodial interrogation is not being uncooperative or anti-police. Neither is invoking the rights granted to you by the Constitution of the United States when your liberty is at stake.<br />
<br />
In this space I attempt to answer the most common questions people have about whether they should give a statement to police, why the answer to that question is almost always no, and what the consequences of either decision might be.<br />
<br />
<span style="color: blue; font-size: large;">Next Up</span><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Part 2: Why do you talk to police who suspect you of a crime?</b><br />
<br />
Caveat: If you or someone you know is currently a suspected of a crime and police want to talk, stop reading this blog and contact a <a href="http://www.glaesmanlaw.com/about" target="_blank"><b>criminal defense attorney</b></a> right away to help you. As always, the words on this blog are no substitute for particularized advice from an actual attorney about your specific legal circumstances.<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small; text-align: center;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="text-align: center;">The </span><a href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/" style="text-align: center;" target="_blank"><b>Glaesman Law Firm, LLC</b></a><span style="text-align: center;"> is a full service criminal defense law firm located at </span><a href="https://www.google.com/maps/place/Glaesman+Law+Firm,+LLC/@38.7751673,-90.4842224,15z/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x0:0xd2780ca8e60b562e?sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwioiZ6I2-LPAhUF94MKHeJmC-YQ_BIIajAL" style="text-align: center;" target="_blank"><b>820 S. Main St. Suite 208, St. Charles, Missouri 63301</b></a><span style="text-align: center;">. If you or a loved one has been charged with a crime or is facing a probation violation hearing, </span><b style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/contact/" target="_blank">call them right away</a></b><span style="text-align: center;"> to discuss your options.</span></span>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06121623853840426212noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4069909394616468492.post-61512455536254807892016-11-03T14:31:00.006-07:002016-11-03T14:35:19.782-07:00What does it mean to have your traffic ticket "fixed"?Unless you're Miss Daisy and you have an ageless Morgan Freeman to drive you from place to place, statistics say you will at some point in your life be stopped and ticketed for a moving violation. Failure to yield, speeding, improper left turn, all the old favorites.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhpK9SfcCyM4KiIQjzz8GfS_WWF_IVIqS953E1eyssfzvdk3RRkjPNbyFIBOo6IV04yCVPfH1kvUjYD7e_XbotJCFBzSxSKAhMweEPsxlLFP0Xlbw-zitYbjeYA-l7B1WqbNObQzh3lGBE0/s1600/traffic+ticket.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhpK9SfcCyM4KiIQjzz8GfS_WWF_IVIqS953E1eyssfzvdk3RRkjPNbyFIBOo6IV04yCVPfH1kvUjYD7e_XbotJCFBzSxSKAhMweEPsxlLFP0Xlbw-zitYbjeYA-l7B1WqbNObQzh3lGBE0/s400/traffic+ticket.jpg" width="205" /></a>When this happens, <a href="https://youtu.be/KAWoP1kncRE?t=45s" target="_blank"><b>its ridiculously annoying.</b></a> I mean, that cop has to have something better to do, right?<br />
<br />
Instead of just paying the fine and taking points on your license, in most cases it's probably better to pay a lawyer to "fix" the ticket. So what does it mean to have your ticket "fixed" by a lawyer?<br />
<br />
First, it DOES NOT mean that your ticket is automatically dismissed once you pay the lawyer. Sure, there are times your tickets can be dismissed, but that is rare. So no, paying $100 to some massive, bulk traffic law firm will not be the end of the pain in your rear that is this traffic ticket.<br />
<span style="color: lime;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white;">What it DOES mean, however, is that <span style="color: orange;"><b>your lawyer will get the prosecutor to amend your speeding ticket to a non-moving violation.</b> </span>Usually littering or illegal parking. By having your ticket amended, <span style="color: orange;"><b>you will avoid having points added to your license</b> </span>by the Department of Revenue. This is important <b><span style="color: orange;">because <span style="color: orange;"><span style="color: lime;">once you accumulate too many points on your license, your car insurance rates go up and you risk losing your license</span>.</span></span></b></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white;"><br /></span><span style="background-color: white;">Sounds painless, right? Wrong.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: orange;"><b>In exchange for that amended violation, you will often pay a much heftier fine plus court costs. </b></span>Some people are forced to pay the court as much as $300 in fines and court costs depending on the circumstances of their traffic violation! Ridiculous. Add to that the $100 (per ticket, of course) you will pay the <a href="http://www.glaesmanlaw.com/" target="_blank"><b>lawyer</b></a> you hired to get the ticket amended, and now your "failure to yield" will result in your failure to eat anything but Ramen for the next month because you're broke.<br />
<br />
How do you know if you need to hire a lawyer for your traffic tickets? Here are a few guidelines you can follow:<br />
<ol>
<li>Make sure your ticket is actually a moving violation and determine how many points on your license it could lead to. You can find a list of moving violations and their point values on the DOR website <a href="http://dor.mo.gov/forms/899.pdf" target="_blank"><b>here</b></a>. </li>
<li>Determine how many points are already on your license. If you're getting close to accumulating enough points to where your license will be revoked, you should probably hire a lawyer to prevent more points.</li>
<li>Check with your insurance company to see how accumulating traffic points would affect your insurance rates.</li>
<li>Was there an accident? Was someone injured or worse? Always get a lawyer when there is an accident resulting in property damage or bodily injury as the results on your ticket could expose you to future civil liability over the accident.</li>
</ol>
As always, every case is different so the best advice I can give you as to whether you need your ticket fixed would be to take advantage of a free consultation offered by a lawyer in your area to determine if you need to hire an attorney to fix your tickets. <b><a href="http://www.glaesmanlaw.com/contact" target="_blank">I happen to know a good one.</a></b><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;">The <a href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/" target="_blank"><b>Glaesman Law Firm, LLC</b></a> is a full service criminal defense law firm located at <a href="https://www.google.com/maps/place/Glaesman+Law+Firm,+LLC/@38.7751673,-90.4842224,15z/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x0:0xd2780ca8e60b562e?sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwioiZ6I2-LPAhUF94MKHeJmC-YQ_BIIajAL" target="_blank"><b>820 S. Main St. Suite 208, St. Charles, Missouri 63301</b></a>. If you or a loved one has been charged with a crime or is facing a probation violation hearing, <b><a href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/contact/" target="_blank">call them right away</a></b> to discuss your options.</span></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06121623853840426212noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4069909394616468492.post-27643136958266496312016-10-17T13:43:00.002-07:002016-10-21T10:22:54.979-07:00Probation Violations: How to Win your Hearing and Stay out of Prison.During the 2014 fiscal year, the Missouri Department of Probation and Parole supervised a total of <b><a href="http://doc.mo.gov/Documents/publications/Offender%20Profile%20FY14.pdf" target="_blank">45,867</a> </b>people on probation. As you can imagine, of that 45,867, not everyone is successful on supervision. If you are one of the unfortunate ones who has had a small hiccup while on probation and are now facing an angry judge and prosecutor looking to put you in prison, continue reading for some tips on how to win your probation violation hearing and stay out of prison.<br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhUq_IXUjO0ehFzomSKxKLRPc2bxdfheNehcOd4iBesowI-vTzu1rokPFIrZkjYveJ7sOBbTx5DDQkZvhjUKe3XmBkZUicIJQVfE52jxGPeCkgFJHwnruNgrqXytkTBZuNAUhZKS5CgL3KJ/s1600/Probation-Violation-Lawyer-Lawsuit-Attorney.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhUq_IXUjO0ehFzomSKxKLRPc2bxdfheNehcOd4iBesowI-vTzu1rokPFIrZkjYveJ7sOBbTx5DDQkZvhjUKe3XmBkZUicIJQVfE52jxGPeCkgFJHwnruNgrqXytkTBZuNAUhZKS5CgL3KJ/s1600/Probation-Violation-Lawyer-Lawsuit-Attorney.jpg" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">As with Tinder, you want the Judge to swipe right...</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
First, what it means to "win" your probation violation can take many forms. <span style="color: #38761d;"><span style="color: blue;">At a probation violation hearing, a judge essentially makes two determinations: 1.) Did you, in fact, violate the terms of your probation? and 2.) If so, what punishment should you face as a result.</span> </span>That's it.<br />
<br />
So, it follows the most obvious way to win your probation violation hearing is to convince the judge the answer to question number 1 is "no". Has it happened? Sure. Is it likely? Nope. Why? Opinions differ, but that is probably a topic for another post.<br />
<br />
If you have little hope of convincing the judge that you did not violate the terms of probation, how do you still "win"? <span style="color: #38761d;">Well, you win by staying on probation and out of prison.</span> Since every probationer, judge, probation officer, and prosecutor are different, the way you go about getting this result varies.<br />
<br />
<b>Here are 5 general strategies you should follow to put yourself in the best possible position to avoid having the judge exchange your probation for a one-way bus pass to the Department of Corrections:</b><br />
<br />
<ol>
<li><b>Fix the Violations that can be Fixed. </b><br /><br /><span style="color: #38761d;">In the most basic terms, to "fix" the violation means to go do the thing that the judge ordered you to do in the first place prior to your probation violation hearing.</span> Examples? Examples: If you owed $1,200 in restitution for the TV you stole and pawned, find a way to pay that money. If the judge ordered you to do 100 hours of community service but as of this date you have done 4 hours, you need to do 96 hours as soon as possible. You get the idea.<br /> </li>
<li><b>Work to Address your Failings.</b><br /><br />Obviously, not every probation violation can be fixed. If you tested positive for meth on a routine probation urinalysis test, you cannot go back in time and make that test negative. Unless you have a time machine - in which case I would advise you to go back in time and not commit the offense for which you are on probation in the first place. Also, get rich by betting on sports. You should do that too.<br /><br /><span style="color: #38761d;"><span style="color: blue;">But, in this non-time machine scenario, your only option is to show the judge that you are working to fix your problem.</span> </span> Did you drop dirty? Go to treatment. Attend 2 NA meetings every week. Voluntarily take drug tests and pile up a bunch of clean tests. Whatever you have to do to convince the judge that, while you messed up, you are working your tail off to better yourself.</li>
<li><b>Make a Positive Contribution to Society.</b><br /><br />The end game for any probation violation hearing is the judge's decision of whether to throw you in prison or not. <span style="color: #38761d;">The math of that decision is actually pretty simple: Is the community better off with you in prison? Or is it better of with you in the community. </span><br /><br />If at the time of your probation violation your greatest contribution to the community is that you've mastered Call of Duty while sitting on your mom's couch, you're in trouble. But, if you are spending your time at a job, taking care of your children, and volunteering in the community, you just might have a shot!<br /><b><br /></b></li>
<li><b>Don't Hang Out With Criminals</b><br /><br />My uncle used to say "If you're with the crowd, you are the crowd." If your name continually pops up on their magic little computer as an associate of other criminals while your probation violation case is pending, the prosecutor and probation officer will no doubt group you in with that crowd. Not ideal. Instead, put yourself in a position where your lawyer can go into court and show the judge, prosecutor and probation officer that you are NOT that crowd. That you're trying. That you're different than those other people that come in here with violations. Most importantly, that you deserve to stay on probation and out of prison.</li>
<li><b>Seek Out Quality Mentors</b><br /><br />Your prospects of staying out of prison increase greatly when you have someone in the community come into court and vouch for you. A pastor. A small-business owner. The leader of a non-profit. Whomever. <span style="color: #38761d;">Surround yourself with these people and work your ass off impress them.</span> Prove to them that you are worthy of staying in the community, and they will help you prove it to the judge by vouching for you in court.</li>
</ol>
If you are on probation and the prosecutor has filed a motion to revoke that probation, don't panic.<span style="color: blue;"> </span><span style="color: #38761d;">So long as you are breathing non-prison air, you have a chance to improve your situation<b>.</b></span><b> </b> Doing the 5 things above will almost certainly increase your odds of staying out of prison. Obviously, if you have questions or need advice on your particular case, I'd love to talk to you about it.<br />
<br />
The <a href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/" target="_blank"><b>Glaesman Law Firm, LLC</b></a> is a full service criminal defense law firm located at <a href="https://www.google.com/maps/place/Glaesman+Law+Firm,+LLC/@38.7751673,-90.4842224,15z/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x0:0xd2780ca8e60b562e?sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwioiZ6I2-LPAhUF94MKHeJmC-YQ_BIIajAL" target="_blank"><b>820 S. Main St. Suite 208, St. Charles, Missouri 63301</b></a>. If you or a loved one has been charged with a crime or is facing a probation violation hearing, <b><a href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/contact/" target="_blank">call them right away</a></b> to discuss your options.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06121623853840426212noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4069909394616468492.post-52580951214732025342016-09-23T10:23:00.001-07:002016-09-23T10:36:35.704-07:00On Hugs and Crossing that LineDuring the protests in Charlotte this week, <b><a href="http://www.ksdk.com/news/man-gives-police-in-riot-gear-hugs/324708036">this man made the news for giving free hugs</a>.</b> To police officers. Suited up in riot gear. In front of his boys, too!<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://static1.businessinsider.com/image/57e4a114077dcc21008b7b30-1271/free_hugs_charlotte_north_carolina_riots_-_youtube.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="170" src="https://static1.businessinsider.com/image/57e4a114077dcc21008b7b30-1271/free_hugs_charlotte_north_carolina_riots_-_youtube.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
What's this have to do with <b><a href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/">criminal defense</a></b>? Here it is:<br />
<br />
This man crossed <u>that</u> line. The line separating protester and police and he did it to show kindness and compassion to the latter. In doing so, he took a lot of heat from some of his fellow protesters. "How do you hug those people?" or "Don't you know those people are bad for society?". He had to know those criticisms would be coming, but he did it anyway. Why? I suppose because he thought it might do some good in a world too quick to label one cause good, and another evil.<br />
<br />
As a <a href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/"><b>criminal defense attorney</b></a>, we also cross a line of sorts every day. We cross the line into court rooms, jail cells and crime scenes with compassion and a determination to defend those who society has marked for separation. In doing so, we take heat from our neighbors, friends, and 3rd cousins we don't like very much anyway. "How do you defend THOSE people?" they ask incredulously. Or, "I could never defend someone who I know is guilty." they state unequivocally. We know those questions are inevitable.<br />
<br />
But we do this work anyway. Hopefully it does some good in a justice system intent on prematurely labeling one person good, and another evil.<br />
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06121623853840426212noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4069909394616468492.post-26792682206703518142016-09-13T14:50:00.002-07:002016-09-13T14:52:44.839-07:00Finding the Smelly Fish: Pre-Arrest Police Investigative Detentions<div data-mce-style="text-align: justify;" style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; text-align: justify;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=4069909394616468492" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"></a></div>
As everyone knows, Police officers investigate crimes and those suspected of committing them. They determine who the bad guys are and they bring those bad guys to justice. But how do they determine who the bad guys are when it is not obvious that a crime is being, or has been committed? <strong>How does a police officer look into something that they think smells fishy without making a full on arrest?</strong> Since people don't usually wear shirts that boldly say "I'm a bad guy committing a crime", police often must detain those they suspect of criminal activity to further investigate.<strong></strong><br />
<span id="goog_1586891861"></span><span id="goog_1586891862"></span><br />
<strong style="background-color: white; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif;"></strong></div>
<div data-mce-style="text-align: justify;" style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; text-align: justify;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj7lRf1w-9GQTQMTsRBGOhUrRWM8Rfy88RT33m4_XxuP1dtP-xSK6aCGkCg2mEeIQ-kOlXxY2O7UvMN8r5-1tOze_RbZQxnDzG0nBbcrBxX631IIEPJYzWqyEbag5kWdlSu-59yk6DRHkhf/s1600/smelly+fish.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj7lRf1w-9GQTQMTsRBGOhUrRWM8Rfy88RT33m4_XxuP1dtP-xSK6aCGkCg2mEeIQ-kOlXxY2O7UvMN8r5-1tOze_RbZQxnDzG0nBbcrBxX631IIEPJYzWqyEbag5kWdlSu-59yk6DRHkhf/s400/smelly+fish.png" /></a>A pre-arrest detention is a term I use to refer to an interaction between you and a police officer wherein the officer has stopped you to further investigate activity deemed suspicious. In other words, they think something fishy is going on and want to look deeper. But can an officer really detain you in any way without first having probable cause to arrest you? Yes. Yes they can.<br />
<br /></div>
<div data-mce-style="text-align: justify;" style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; text-align: justify;">
These pre-arrest, pre-probable cause, what is making that fish smell type interactions really come in two flavors:</div>
<h4 data-mce-style="text-align: justify;" style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; text-align: justify;">
1. Consensual Encounter</h4>
<div data-mce-style="text-align: justify;" style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; text-align: justify;">
The first pre-arrest detention is actually not legally a detention at all. It is an interaction between a citizen and an officer that is consensual on the part of the citizen. What does this mean?</div>
<div data-mce-style="text-align: justify;" style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; text-align: justify;">
</div>
<div data-mce-style="text-align: justify;" style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; text-align: justify;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
It means that, as long as the officer has the right to be in the physical location where the encounter occurs, they apply no physical force or make no show of force to effectuate the encounter and a reasonable person in your position would feel free to disregard them and go about your business they can talk to you about anything under the sun. Courts have held that, even when an officer is in uniform with their gun in its holster and an active radio active on their shoulder, this sort of casual encounter is not a detention for 4th Amendment purposes.<br />
<br /></div>
<div data-mce-style="text-align: justify;" style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; text-align: justify;">
So, who cares? You should. <strong>So long as your interaction with an officer remains a casual encounter, your 4th Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure does not apply.</strong><br />
<strong><br /></strong></div>
<div data-mce-style="text-align: justify;" style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; text-align: justify;">
<span data-mce-style="color: #0000ff;" style="color: blue;"><em>Suppose you are standing in line at a Walgreens in front of a uniformed police officer about to buy some cold medicine. The officer asks you what the cold medicine is for and you blurt out that the cold medicine is for your Meth kitchen.</em></span><br />
<span data-mce-style="color: #0000ff;" style="color: blue;"><em><br /></em></span></div>
<div data-mce-style="text-align: justify;" style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; text-align: justify;">
At your future trial for the attempted manufacturing of Meth, that statement would be used against you. This detention was a casual encounter because the officer had a right to be in the Walgreens and you were free to leave at any point. You are afforded no 4th Amendment protections here because you are not seized under the law.</div>
<div data-mce-style="text-align: justify;" style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; text-align: justify;">
Moral of the story: If a cop casually asks you what the cold medicine is for, the answer should always unequivocally be "for a cold".</div>
<h4 data-mce-style="text-align: justify;" style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; text-align: justify;">
2. Investigative Detention, i.e. the Terry Stop</h4>
<div data-mce-style="text-align: justify;" style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; text-align: justify;">
An investigative detention occurs when police stop you because they suspect that you are involved in criminal activity and they detain you so that they can investigate.</div>
<div data-mce-style="text-align: justify;" style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; text-align: justify;">
A Terry Stop is more intrusive than a consensual encounter because you are seized. How do you know you have been seized? When you or any other reasonable human in your shoes would not feel free to leave because the officer has physically restrained you or ordered you to stay put. Once this happens, unlike consensual encounters, your 4th Amendment right to be free from <span data-mce-style="text-decoration: underline;" style="text-decoration: underline;">unreasonable</span> searches and seizures attach!<br />
<br /></div>
<div data-mce-style="text-align: justify;" style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; text-align: justify;">
What makes a Terry Stop reasonable? <strong>To be reasonable, the officer initiating the stop must have reasonable suspicion based upon articulable facts that you are involved in criminal activity.</strong> Just what level of suspicion is, or is not, reasonable has been defined and re-defined by state and federal courts across this land. We know it is something less than probable cause, but something more than an officer's hunch. <strong>Once a Terry Stop is initiated, the officer may pat you down for weapons and detain you for as long as necessary to confirm or dispel their suspicion.</strong><br />
<strong><br /></strong></div>
<div data-mce-style="text-align: justify;" style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; text-align: justify;">
<span data-mce-style="color: #0000ff;" style="color: blue;"><em>Refer to the Walgreens scenario above, only this time imagine that, instead of outing your Meth production business, you pay for the cold medicine and go into the bathroom. The officer follows you into the bathroom, shows you his badge, identifies himself as an officer, and orders you out of the bathroom for questioning. Once outside of the bathroom, the officer sees a bulge in your coat pocket so he pats you down for weapons only to find a rather large baggie of methamphetamine instead.</em></span><br />
<span data-mce-style="color: #0000ff;" style="color: blue;"><em><br /></em></span></div>
<div data-mce-style="text-align: justify;" style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; text-align: justify;">
In this scenario, your 4th Amendment rights attach the minute he confronts you in the bathroom, shows his authority as an officer and orders you outside for questioning because a reasonable person in your position would not feel free to leave. As such, the officer would need reasonable suspicion based on articulable facts that you were involved in criminal activity at the time he confronted you for the detention to be reasonable. If the detention was reasonable, the baggie of Meth he finds would not be suppressed and could be used against you at trial. If it was unreasonable, they would.<br />
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=4069909394616468492" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"></a><br /></div>
<div data-mce-style="text-align: justify;" style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; text-align: justify;">
Based only on the facts I have given you in this example, that officer likely did not have suspicion that was reasonable. But, police officers aren't dumb. They know some criminal defense attorney like myself will later be scrutinizing the reasonableness of their suspicion and so the facts are not usually this straight forward. If the officer testifies that he was suspicion because you fit the description of a known Meth manufacturer, that you were sweating bullets in December out of nervousness, that this particular Walgreens was in an area known for its Meth manufuacturing problem, and that he called in to the state pseudoephedrin registry and discovered you bought excessive amounts of pseudoephedrin in the preceding month, a judge would find his suspicion was reasonable.<br />
<br /></div>
<div data-mce-style="text-align: justify;" style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", "Bitstream Charter", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; text-align: justify;">
If you or someone you know has been arrested for a crime that arose from a pre-arrest investigative detention, contact a <strong><a data-mce-href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/contact/" href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/contact/">criminal defense attorney </a></strong>to determine if the particular facts and circumstances surrounding your seizure were legal under the 4th Amendment.</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06121623853840426212noreply@blogger.comSt. Louis, MO, USA38.6270025 -90.199404238.230193 -90.844851200000008 39.023812000000007 -89.5539572tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4069909394616468492.post-54170182806421717852016-09-13T13:00:00.001-07:002016-09-23T10:34:21.445-07:00Free Criminal Defense Information<h2 style="color: #333333; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; text-align: center;">
<br /></h2>
<div style="color: #333333; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">As a <strong><a data-mce-href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/about/" href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/about/">criminal defense attorney</a></strong>, I field questions about <strong><a data-mce-href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/practice-areas/" href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/practice-areas/">Criminal Defense and DWI</a></strong> law everyday from clients, other lawyers, friends, family and tire kickers looking for free legal information.</span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">The law in this country is weird. On the one hand, if the law exists on the books, you as a citizen are deemed to have notice of that law and are required not to break it. But if that is true, why do people like myself need to spend 3 years and hundreds of thousands of dollars just to understand and correctly apply it? Have you ever tried to read a statute? It's like a different language. Even worse, ever tried to buy the book in which the statutes are written? Unless you've taken out a second mortgage, probably not.</span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><strong>If the law expects every day people to just know it, then I believe it should be accessible.</strong> With this blog, I will do what many in this profession think to be unforgivable - give away legal knowledge.* Lawyers don't own the law, the people do. So, when I come across a topic relevant to criminal defense that I feel may be of interest to the people, I will give my two cents on it here. For everyone to see.</span></div>
<div style="color: #333333; font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px;">
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;">*Keep in mind, while the content I provide here is meant to be informative, no criminal defense blog can substitute <strong><a data-mce-href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/contact/" href="http://glaesmanlaw.com/contact/">talking to a real criminal defense attorney</a></strong> about your specific case.</span></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06121623853840426212noreply@blogger.comSt. Louis, MO, USA38.6270025 -90.199404238.230193 -90.844851200000008 39.023812000000007 -89.5539572